Merging tuples branch into mainline today

Fri Jul 25 16:20:00 GMT 2008

Diego Novillo wrote:
>> Why not fix that before merging, then?
>> Because it is not a pass that is run by default, it is not receiving
> active maintenance and the cost/benefit of doing it pre-merge is lower
> than fixing the pass post-merge. If that is a problem, we can keep
> delaying the merge until it's fixed, of course.

Normally, we try to get major new functionality to meet the 
no-regression test before merging. However, I can see that in the case 
of tuples it might be easier for everyone to stop having to worry about 
tuplifying new code.
I think that someone, though, should be committed to fixing this pass 
ASAP after it's checked in; waiting until late August to fix it seems 
bad. Is there someone else who can commit to working on it as a high 
priority after the main tuples checkin?
-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713