classpath-0.98 merge for GCC-4.4
Joshua Sumali
jsumali@redhat.com
Mon Aug 11 16:08:00 GMT 2008
Matthias Klose wrote:
> Andrew Haley schrieb:
>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>> Ideally, I'd prefer a GCJ release to be based on a Classpath
>>> release, if just so bug reports against GCJ 4.4 can be more
>>> closely linked to a Classpath release.
>>>>> Me too.
>>>>>>> That said, I think the tree is in okay shape at the moment. If
>>> you do merge now, I'd suggest using the time to test the
>>> completed merge, especially the new locale changes.
>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>>> As a third option, perhaps the main merge could be done now,
>>> covering all the feature changes (GJDoc, localisation). I
>>> could then submit the remaining bug fixes planned for 0.98 to
>>> GCJ separately, as they get sent to Classpath. We'd then end
>>> up with 0.98 in GCJ (effectively).
>>>>> That's my suggestion, as long as it doesn't make too much work
>> for Doko.
>>>> I can start working on this on a merge branch. But being on a conference I'm not
> sure that I will finish this before my vacation until the end of August. In the
> past Joshua did offer to do a merge as well. Joshua, would you be able to work
> on this merge as well?
>> Matthias
>I would like to, but I don't think I'll have the time to do so. My last
day is on Wednesday and I can't guarantee any availability after that :(
Josh
More information about the Java
mailing list