Gcj binaries performance (arm-linux)

ffileppo ffileppo@libero.it
Mon Apr 28 14:55:00 GMT 2008


> > I'm quite surprised of this result, I thought that a binary compiled with gcj would be much faster than a java virtual machine.
>> So would I.
>> > I've also tried to pass some options (e.g. -march=, -mtune, -mcpu...) when compiling with gcj but results are not changing.
> >
> > Any idea to improve performance?
>> Without seeing your code, it's impossible to say. I don't want
> to speculate.
>> Andrew.
>
Hi Andrew,
thanks for your interest. Here is the code:
public final class MyPanel {
 private static final int NUM_ELEMENTS = 1000;
 public static final int NUM_LOOP = 100;
 public MyPanel(){}
 public static void main(String args[]) {
 MyPanel mp = new MyPanel();
 mp.sortArray();
 }
 private void sortArray() {
 System.out.println("Test \"Bubble Sort\" (Num loop: " + NUM_LOOP + ")");
 int[] array = new int[NUM_ELEMENTS];
 int l = 0, i = 0;
 long sysTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
 for (l = 0; l < NUM_LOOP; l++) {
 for (i = 0; i < NUM_ELEMENTS; i++) {
 array[i] = NUM_ELEMENTS - i;
 }
 BubbleSort(array, NUM_ELEMENTS);
 if(l == 0)
 System.out.println("First loop time: " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - sysTime));
 }
 System.out.println("Total time elapsed: " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - sysTime));
 }
 private void BubbleSort(int array[], int elemN) {
 int i, tmp;
 int alto = elemN;
 while (alto > 0) {
 for (i = 0; i < alto - 1; i++) {
 if (array[i] > array[i + 1]) {
 tmp = array[i];
 array[i] = array[i + 1];
 array[i + 1] = tmp;
 }
 }
 alto--;
 }
 }
}


More information about the Java mailing list

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /