Failure to build libjava on 512MB machine

Wed Jan 31 01:58:00 GMT 2007

On 2007年1月30日, Andrew Haley wrote:
> 78.67user 1.29system 1:20.01elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
>> and indeed, it does want a lot of memory - at peak some 550m. It'll
> be smaller on a 32-bit box, but not much smaller.

Ouch. I can confirm that on a 32-bit box of mine it fails with about
500MB of main memory.
On 2007年1月30日, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I suppose with some awful build hacking we could split this .o into
> multiple parts. I'm fine with the situation as it is, myself, but I
> will do this if the consensus is that we should.

Please, pleeease. This really hurts. No I can no longer build libgcj
on my notebook and one or two older (but not that old) testers of mine.
Ger ``begging'' ald