Hi All, >Either a wrong gcj is choosen or the output should be named "ecj" >instead of "ecj.exe". Furthermore, the compilation fails: I've only had time to half-skim this thread, but I thought I identified and fixed this issue on the ecj branch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2006-q4/msg00221.html I've only half-skimmed this, though, so I don't know whether we're talking about the same thing. -- Mohan http://www.thisiscool.com/ http://www.animalsong.org/