Hi Dave, > Here's the patch from last December that introduced ParkHelper: >http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2006-q4/msg00246.html >but I couldn't find any discussion of the no-threads case in the related >conversation; I did, however, find a post from 2004 saying "Expect it to be >bit-rotted". I was the one who did the ParkHelper refactoring and can confirm that accounting for the no-threads case wasn't a requirement for this patch being accepted. The higher-ups can certainly comment more, but I was under the impression that the no-threads code seems untouched and unloved in all the years I've been on this list. -- Mohan http://www.thisiscool.com/ http://www.animalsong.org/