Bug in JNI RegisterNatives?

Tue Oct 10 17:17:00 GMT 2006

Hi Tom,
Thank you for all the work on this.
Using a rewrite of my patch is fine.
I will try it out in the next days.
The patch looks good, but I found a little detail:
Shouldn't savehash be freed at the end of nathash_find?
	// free old table after rehash
	_Jv_Free (savehash);
I had this in my original patch.
Jürg
On 10.10.2006, at 01:38, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Juerg" == Juerg Lehni <juerg@scratchdisk.com> writes:
>> Juerg> I am wondering wether this patch will eventally be included
> Juerg> I've submitted it more than 3 months ago, and nothing seems 
> to have
> Juerg> happened since.
>> Juerg> Is there anything I need to do to get it accepted?
>> I think your patch is too big to go in without an assignment. And,
> given the proximity of 4.2, and the time needed to get the paperwork
> in order, I thought I would just rewrite it.
>> Basically I just added a new class name field to the entries in the
> hash table. Could you try this patch with your test case and let me
> know if it works? If it does I will check it in.
>> Thanks, and sorry for the difficulty here.
>> Tom