Patch for i386-darwin: test suite results

Thu Mar 16 23:57:00 GMT 2006

On 17/mar/2006, at 00:09, Andreas Tobler wrote:
> All tests do pass? Please send the diffs to me!

Here they are.
> Please do a patch run for each package on it's own. Means one for 
> gcc, one for boehm-gc, one for libffi and one for libjava/gcj. It 
> makes review easier. Also, do not include *.in or configure files 
> in the diff. Only Makefile.am or configure.ac the rest we can 
> generate on our own. Comment files are also not needed.

Ok. I'm not sending boehm patches, simply import the 6.7 sources from 
Hans' distribution. I'm attaching the other patches.
> My preference would be that you would do the work on svn head, aka 
> 4.2. If we see that it makes sense, we will backport to 4.1.

libffi on the trunk will not be patchable as-is with these patches, 
when I have some spare time I'll look on it. In the mean time, we can 
make it work on the 4.0 branch, I bet a lot of people will be happy :)
> Looks ok, but the mountain is very high :)

And the path to the top is very slippery... :)
> The unwind stuff will cause you some severe work.

Where do I have to look in order to fix the unwind stuff? Which are 
the drawbacks of not having it?
Cheers,
 Sandro
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: gcc-top.diff
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 691 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/java/attachments/20060316/be7ea6e5/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: libffi.diff
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 6118 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/java/attachments/20060316/be7ea6e5/attachment-0001.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: libjava.diff
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1118 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/java/attachments/20060316/be7ea6e5/attachment-0002.obj>