RFC: Change C++ ABI so that interface dispatch does not depend on reflection.
David Daney
ddaney@avtrex.com
Tue Jan 31 19:44:00 GMT 2006
Andrew Haley wrote:
> > Tom Tromey wrote:
> > >
> > > Building the idt table at compile time, for the C++ ABI, seems like a
> > > general improvement.
>> Not if it adds more relocs.
You could change the entries to be offsets from the table. Then they
could be resolved by ld. Unfortunatly some archetectures may not allow
these link time relocations across sections (For some reason unknown to
me recent binutils versions seem be this way for MIPS, but older
versions accepted it).
David Daney.
More information about the Java
mailing list