micro-libgcj merge reconsidered

Mon Jan 16 21:04:00 GMT 2006

Joel Dice wrote:
> In light of both of these concerns, I think the advice of Steph 
> Meslin-Weber and others is most appropriate - create a branch for 
> micro-libgcj as proposed, but without intending to merge it into the 
> trunk. Others may then use that branch as a basis for their own 
> branches and take them in whatever directions they care to. Elements 
> from any of these branches may then be merged back into the trunk if and 
> when there is demand for them.
>> How does that sound?
>
Sounds excellent to me.
cheers,
dalibor topic