RFC: peephole vs RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Tue Jan 3 16:13:00 GMT 2006

• Previous message (by thread): RFC: peephole vs RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P
• Next message (by thread): RFC: peephole vs RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 08:10:21PM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> And flow2 calls split_all_insns before the
> prologue and epilogue insns are threaded. When did the bogus split
> happen?

There are at least 3 post-reload split points.
r~

---

• Previous message (by thread): RFC: peephole vs RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P
• Next message (by thread): RFC: peephole vs RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Java mailing list