RFC: peephole vs RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P

Tue Jan 3 03:35:00 GMT 2006

On 2005年12月19日, Richard Henderson wrote:
> I think that this is all complicated enough that we should
> simply deny peepholing insns with RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P set.

I was just bitten by the same behavior for define_split.
Should the same go for define_splits and maybe also as a guard
test for combine? Maybe a utility function to use by all insn
transformations?
brgds, H-P