GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

Fri May 6 15:07:00 GMT 2005

Hi there!
>Java is a simple language, used as the intro learning language in most
>universities that I know of. Not having to plan memory management like
>c++ motivates very fast development. Compiling small utils with it and
>having them be portable, even on GNU systems, is an incredible selling
>point. This isn't really possible without static linking.
>>Sometimes I see a great divide between the developers of gcj, and the
>actual users of it. It seems to only target the server setting, or the
>user who wishes to compile existing apps and only run them on their
>own system. This target could be much wider in scope with static
>linking.
>>I am such a users and I am having tons of problems because of GCJ's 
nearly-broken static linking capabilities.
Since libgcj isn't binary compatible at all over versions, it would be 
great if it would be possible to deploy statically linked 
runs-out-of-the-box executables.
lg Clemens