gcj on osx questions

Thu Dec 15 23:09:00 GMT 2005

Mohan Embar wrote:
>> Mohan> No idea, but these posts clued me off and the fix worked for me:
>>>> IMO the patch is fine, but it does need a comment explaining why the
>> memset is there.
>>>> Where should this patch go? 4.0x? 4.1? 4.2? (It's against 4.02).
>
It should certainly go on the trunk, but I don't see a problem applying 
it to the 4.0/4.1branches as well if the patch is useful to those 
wanting to run gcj on OS X.
Bryce