libgcj maintenance for 4.0.x branch

Sat Apr 16 08:03:00 GMT 2005

Tom Tromey writes:
 >
 > The proposed rule here is actually fairly conservative, perhaps overly
 > so.
I think so. I wonder if the idea of never breaking the ABI is a bit
too optimistic. We will try, but ...
 > Starting with 4.1 I would like to see a much less conservative
 > rule, namely that we only promise compatibility if you use
 > -findirect-dispatch.
Yes.
Andrew.