Per Bothner wrote: > As Tom pointed out, we should use the new %<...%> or %qs > conventions: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2004-03/msg00302.html Actually that may be confusing, since it proposed %`...%' but the actual implementation / current standard is %<...%>. -- --Per Bothner per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/