Binary compatibility and finding compiled classes
Andrew Haley
aph@redhat.com
Sat Oct 9 09:00:00 GMT 2004
David Daney writes:
> Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>>>"Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:
> >
> >
> >>>Anyone have other ideas, comments, or constraints?
> >
> >
> > Andrew> Put the DSO in the jar.
> >
> > Some folks out there actually do this, I've seen code for it.
> >
> > I'm not sure we ought to do it ourselves though. For one thing it
> > means that signed jars would have to be re-signed.
>
> I don't think so. IIRC the signing is on a per classfile basis, so adding
> extra things to the jar would not invalidate the signature.
>
> > For another, it
> > interferes with common packaging approaches that make jars noarch.
Surely that's fixable. It's crazy to disallow perfectly good
engineering solutions just because of packaging.
> I agree with this part. We want a way to tightly associate a DSO
> with a jar file without having to touch the jar itself.
Or put the jar in the DSO...
Andrew.
More information about the Java
mailing list