Obfuscation - optimisation?
Boehm, Hans
hans.boehm@hp.com
Wed Nov 24 22:39:00 GMT 2004
It does claim to eliminate unused methods and fields,
which should impact both code and heap size. I would
expect substantially so, in some cases. But I
have no experience with it ...
Hans
> -----Original Message-----
> From: java-owner@gcc.gnu.org
> [mailto:java-owner@gcc.gnu.org]On Behalf Of
> Andrew Haley
> Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 11:23 AM
> To: Doctor Bill
> Cc: Martin Egholm Nielsen; java@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Obfuscation - optimisation?
>>> Doctor Bill writes:
> > On 2004年11月24日 12:08:38 +0000, Andrew Haley
> <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > Martin Egholm Nielsen writes:
> > > "TheA clue is in the bit of my post you snipped.
> http://proguard.sourceforge.net/
>> > In any event, this description ignores the main point of
> > obfuscation is not to reduce program size, but to make a reverse
> > compile of the program more difficult to read.
>> Perhaps, but that's not the goal of the original poster.
>> Andrew.
>>
More information about the Java
mailing list