[BC] test results from a darwin build.

Tue Nov 23 00:23:00 GMT 2004

Andrew Haley wrote:
>Andrew Haley writes:
> > Andreas Tobler writes:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > just a fyi. I posted my first results from a bc build on darwin.
> > > 
> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-11/msg00718.html
> > > 
> > > A few ICE's and a few ': error: final field 'CONST' may not have been 
> > > initialized' (and similars) cross my eyes on a first view.
> > > 
> > > I rebuild to make the test a bit faster but I keep the log around.
> > > 
> > > Maybe someone is interested.
> > 
> > Very! Darwin shouldn't really be worse than Linux with these tests.
>>Ah, forget that. I have been informed that static initializers in gcj
>DSOs don't work in Darwin. Which probably explains it all...
>> From what I understand, they dp work when the dylibs are explicitly 
linked (-l), but not when they are dlopen'ed. (Otherwise, a shared 
libgcj wouldn't work at all on Darwin). So, I don't think that the 
shared-library initializers issue has much to do with this.
Bryce