Q about geom implementation

Mon Nov 22 06:17:00 GMT 2004

Am Montag, 22. November 2004 02:10 schrieb Jerry Quinn:
> I notice that several methods such as RectangularShape.getBounds2D
> are missing according to the comparison of gcj with jdk. I can see
> that they get implemented by the concrete implementations of
> classes such as Rectangle2D.Double.
>> However, if a client program were to derive a class from
> RectangularShape, it could break due to the absence of this method.
> So, I wanted to ask those who know for opinions on providing
> implementations for the missing methods in java.awt.geom.

It's perhaps a good idea to cross-post such questions to 
classpath@gnu.org to get sure to reach all people contributing. I 
know some people are only subscribed to either classpath@gnu.org or 
java@gcc.gnu.org.
Michael
-- 
Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/