Incorrect Java methods called from CNI

Mon May 10 22:12:00 GMT 2004

Dave Menendez wrote:
>	movl	(%eax), %edx
>	addl	56,ドル %edx
>	movl	-12(%ebp), %eax
>	movl	%eax, (%esp)
>	movl	(%edx), %eax
>	call	*%eax
>>>Looks like this is the call in question. Its offseting the vtable 
pointer by 56 bytes.
Heres the vtable, run through c++filt, cleaned up a bit, and with byte 
offsets added:
-8 .long 0
-4 .long 0
 0 .long Classification.class$
 4 .long -37748735
 8 .long java.lang.Object.finalize()
 12 .long hashCode()
 16 .long equals(java.lang.Object)
 20 .long toString()
 24 .long clone()
 28 .long addClassificationListener(ClassificationListener)
 32 .long fireClassificationChange()
 36 .long getNumberOfListeners()
 40 .long isImmutable()
 44 .long removeAllListeners()
 48 .long removeClassificationListener(ClassificationListener)
 52 .long getClassification()
 56 .long add(Marking)
 60 .long clear()
 64 .long clearMarkings()
 68 .long combine(Classification)
 72 .long compareTo(Classification)
 76 .long contains(java.lang.Object)
So, its obviously going to call add() - the offset to call clear() 
should be 60. For some reason, the C++ compiler's idea of where the 
method is in the vtable doesn't match the Java compiler's. Can you post 
the relavent portions of the .h file for this class, and the method 
declarations from the Java source code (not the code itself, just the 
name & access modifiers etc)?
Bryce