gdb with gcj

Sat May 1 15:40:00 GMT 2004

On May 1, 2004, at 9:41 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> The last time I investigated this, some of the optimizers (CSE?
> loop?) were replacing one variable with another. This doesn't change
> the semantics of the program but the new variable is no longer marked
> as a user variable and doesn't carry debug info.

Lets make sure there is a PR on this. We shouldn't have to recompile 
just to debug. There is something similar already for tree-ssa:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14638
Hopefully a solution for the tree-ssa issue will apply here as well.
Regards
Bryce.