libgcj and the NPTL posix threads implementation

Mon Mar 1 15:23:00 GMT 2004

On Mon, 2004年03月01日 at 06:12, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Anthony Green writes:
> > On Mon, 2004年03月01日 at 03:02, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > > What happens with this test case if you use LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.3?
> > 
> > Segmentation fault. Do you think this means we shouldn't use this?
>> Yes, I think it does. We shouldn't crash with LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.3.

I think we should push this problem over to Linux distro package
maintainers. Isn't the right way to do this is to have a libgcj in
/usr/lib/tls and another in /usr/lib, just like libc?
gcc/libjava should once again configure and build outside of the GCC
tree for this to happen. I think it's just a tweak or two away from
working. Then an RPM spec file could build gcc with no libgcj, and then
build two libgcj's outside the tree.
AG
-- 
Anthony Green <green@redhat.com>
Red Hat, Inc.