bootstrap failure on alpha and solaris Re: [RFA] automake mas s update, 2 of 2

Fri Jun 18 10:59:00 GMT 2004

Boehm, Hans wrote:
> I'm also not sure that renaming things from ...mach_dep... to ...arch_dep...
> is an improvement. In the gcc context that makes sense. But for the upstream
> distribution, the dependency is as much on the tool chain as on the
> architecture.

Ugh! Sorry, I did rename to sparc_mach_dep.s (small s) and not to arch. 
I was typing out of my mind far away from the machines.
>>That was the first step I did, on solaris I renamed it to 
>>sparc_arch_dep.s

Andreas