Can gcj output a syntax tree?

Wed Jun 16 22:54:00 GMT 2004

>>>>> "Bryce" == Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay@redhat.com> writes:

Bryce> With recent CVS gcc you can use the various -fdump-tree- options to do
Bryce> this, eg: -fdump-tree-all. This works with gcj. I don't think the
Bryce> -fdump-translation-tree option exists any more.
There's also the old -fxref code. It doesn't seem to work at the
moment. You would have to write your own expander and link it into
gcj for it to work. And it is probably a bit broken, too, since it is
never tested or used.
This is actually a good candidate for deletion IMO -- there are bits
all over the front end to generate different trees depending on
`flag_emit_xref'. These paths aren't tested...
Tom