libltdl proposal for libgcj

Wed Jul 14 19:38:00 GMT 2004

On Wed, 2004年07月14日 at 12:26, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> So you're saying, if your change go in, I can no longer build my own
> toolchain with a prefix other than /usr, use that to build Java
> libraries that get installed in /usr/lib and expect them to work?

Kind of. Everything should work as-is if you set LD_LIBRARY_PATH. 
Explicit linking against those libraries should work as well. Only the
class name to library name lookup and linking won't work.
But I'm not proposing a change anymore since I have an LD_PRELOAD hack
that works for me, and the long- (medium?-) term solution is to abandon
this plan once the BC ABI change is implemented.
Andrew - when do you think this will go into mainline?
AG
-- 
Anthony Green <green@redhat.com>
Red Hat, Inc.