inter-class optimizations

Thu Feb 19 10:50:00 GMT 2004

Andrew Haley wrote:
> > This thread:
> > 
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-02/threads.html#01085
> > 
> > seems to conclude that we put in -fno-omit-frame-pointer
> > anyways for libjava since we depend on backtrace( ), which
> > in older libc-s (and on MinGW, BTW) uses the frame-pointer
> > to walk the call frames.
>> That's right. And whatever is the default for gcc as a whole, we can
> continue to relay on stack frames with a frame pointer until we're
> ready to switch.

...which means changes to the GCJ spec file also as
merely building libgcj with -fno-omit-frame-pointer
doesn't help (I'm referring to your configure.{in,host}
patch in the thread referenced above.)
Ranjit.
-- 
Ranjit Mathew Email: rmathew AT hotmail DOT com
Bangalore, INDIA. Web: http://ranjitmathew.tripod.com/