gcj-security and some issues

Thu Apr 29 15:47:00 GMT 2004

Bryce McKinlay writes:
 > Andrew Haley wrote:
 > 
 > > > Well, you'd think so, but this is the reason why my patch is taking so 
 > > > long - it becomes complicated because of the Linker/PLT messing function 
 > > > pointers up.
 > >
 > >Right, but the unwinder we have already does basically the same thing
 > >and it's fine except for native methods, which are outside the sandbox
 > >anyway.
 > 
 > Its also broken for non-native static methods which are in a shared
 > library and called directly from the application binary.
Ah, right. I hadn't spotted that. Clearly that needs fixing, then.
Andrew.