problem building a GCJ-friendly GNU Crypto
Mark Wielaard
mark@klomp.org
Thu Sep 25 21:59:00 GMT 2003
Hi all,
On Sat, 2003年09月20日 at 21:33, Roger Sayle wrote:
>> Thanks for the test case. Looking at it I can immediately guess what
> the problem is: the evaluation order of operands to binary operators.
> A quick check of section 15.7.1 of the Java language specification
> reveals that the semantics are indeed different from C and C++s which
> allow side-effecting operands to be evaluated in arbitrary order.
>> I'm currently working on a patch [...]
FYI. I just tried a new checkout of gcc which contains Roger his latest
(workaround) patch for this issue. gnu-crypto compiles out of the box
with this and make check gives 0 failures.
Cheers,
Mark
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/java/attachments/20030925/8f445c75/attachment.sig>
More information about the Java
mailing list