Failure to build gcc-3.4 20030909 Java sourcefiles: @libgcj.sourcelist: gcj: Internal error: Killed (program jc1)

Tue Sep 16 15:56:00 GMT 2003

Jeff Sturm writes:
 > On 2003年9月16日, Andrew Haley wrote:
 > > Mohan Embar writes:
 > > >
 > > > >But, I see "big" memory usage, on this 128 MB old box (with 256 MB swap)...
 > > > >Might the memory available be a problem?
 > > >
 > > > Andrew Haley noted that this uses a lot of memory - more than 256M.
 > > >
 > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q3/msg00627.html
 > > >
 > > > I'll defer any resolution of this to the higher-ups.
 > >
 > > I'm not sure that we can require huge memory to build libgcj.
 > 
 > What if libgcj looks for --enable-intermodule, as gcc itself now does?
 > I'd take that to mean "I have lots of memory, so build in a way that gives
 > better optimizations and may build faster". Not unlike the current libgcj
 > situation.
Sounds good. Trouble is, we are using this "compile everything at
once" to get around a libtool (and/or shell) bug, aren't we?
Andrew.