GCJ and $PREFIX/include

Mon Sep 1 09:01:00 GMT 2003

I hope I haven't missed anything, but how about the following? Is
anybody planning to implement that?
On 2003年6月18日, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Thu, 8 May 2003, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>>>> The issue is that one may want to have gcc 3.1, 3.2.3, and 3.3-snapshot
>>>> installed all at the same time. With the positioning of the Java bits,
>>>> they stomp on top of each other.
>>> It's not just that. Cross compilers (rightly) don't look in
>>> $PREFIX/include, so you can't properly build CNI code with a cross g++.
>>> We discussed this recently (see this thread:
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2003-04/msg00243.html ), and were wondering
>>> if it would be OK to put the headers in $PREFIX/include/c++/VERSION.
>> This looks like a solution to the problem you are seeing for cross-
>> compiles _and_ it solves David's problem as well, _and_ it is cheap
>> in that we won't have to tweak include path. ;-)
> (Benjamin didn't object to the $PREFIX/include/c++/VERSION solution, so
> that indeed seems like the simplest approach.)

Gerald
-- 
Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry) gerald@pfeifer.com http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/