3.4 versus 3.3 executable size on win32
Erik Poupaert
erik.poupaert@skynet.be
Mon Oct 20 10:00:00 GMT 2003
I just compiled exactly the same source tree on win32 one time with 3.3 and one time
with 3.4. The resulting 3.4 executable is much larger than the resulting
3.3 executable.
I've used link options: -s -Os.
I am comparing gcc33-20030802 versus gcc34-20031006 (from thisiscool).
Is there a reason why 3.4 produces substantially larger executables than 3.3 on
win32?
More information about the Java
mailing list