much smaller bytecode with gcj?

Sat Nov 29 08:29:00 GMT 2003

On Nov 28, 2003, at 9:21 PM, Adam Megacz wrote:
> I've mentioned mips2java here before. Strangely, gcj -O3 emits *much*
> smaller bytecode than either javac or jikes when compiling the output
> from our tool. Any ideas why this might be? The difference is 
> striking:

Its just debugging info. Turns out compiling with -O anything 
automatically adds -g0. It looks like this just eliminates line number 
from the classfile.
-Brian