Unreviewed patch
Anthony Green
green@redhat.com
Thu Jun 12 15:22:00 GMT 2003
On Thu, 2003年06月12日 at 07:15, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Hopefully some more qualified person out there will
> speak up (and we'll end up with a libffi entry in MAINTAINERS).
>> I believe we've agreed in the past that port maintainers can make
> port-specific libffi changes. So I think you can check in your fix on
> that basis.
The situation is a little frustrating because it's not made explicit in
the MAINTAINERS file. I once tried to clear this up with the SC through
one of its members, but got no reply.
My suggestion is that the following people should be able to approve
libffi changes:
0. Global maintainers
1. GCC port maintainers, since many times they will be the only ones who
understand the asm code.
2. Tromey, as the maintainer of libgcj, since this is an important part
of it.
3. Me, as the original author.
BTW - I think we should also add MAINTAINERS entries for zlib, boehm-gc
and fastjar.
AG
--
Anthony Green <green@redhat.com>
Red Hat, Inc.
More information about the Java
mailing list