Problems with Mohans GCJ 20030522 build
Andrew Haley
aph@redhat.com
Tue Jun 3 12:49:00 GMT 2003
Ranjit Mathew writes:
> > > I have discussed this with Mohan, but we haven't figured out
> > > why GCJ as of >20030409 must have thisiscool-gcc\gcc-3.3\bin
> > > in the path.
> > >
> > > - gcj fails if it is not in the path
> > >
> > > [apply] com/cyviz/xyzmodem/Upload.java:164: warning: unreachable
> > > bytecode from 221 to before 224
> > > [apply] gcj.exe: installation problem, cannot exec `as': No such
> > > file or directory
> >
> > Where is `as' installed on your system? It shouldn't be in gcc-3.3\bin.
>
> Ummm...why do you say so? I've had binutils in the same "prefix"
> as GCC for quite some time now and it hasn't given me any problems
> as such.
It's just weird, that's all. Unless you have a nonstandard `as', I'd
expect to find it in the main bin directory. I'd also expect the
gcc-x.x dirs to contain the installed gcc bin tree. The reason for
this is so that when you reinstall gcc you can blow away the whole
gcc-bin directory first, so that there's no cruft left behind. But of
course everyone is free to install things anywhere they wish.
Andrew.
More information about the Java
mailing list