Hi Tom, >Simon> a while ago we discussed here a problem of mine: >>I don't remember that discussion, sorry. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q2/msg00342.html ...which refers to João's patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q2/msg00295.html I haven't had time to follow up on this. My instinct was to go with Unicows in these cases, but I feel bad about neglecting João's short-term solution. That's also why I was motivated to document the MinGW build process so that others are free to communicate their patches in a way that others can build gcj with them, even if I don't agree with these or have the time to evaluate them. -- Mohan http://www.thisiscool.com/ http://www.animalsong.org/