gcc-3.3 and statically linked mingw binaries?
Andrew Haley
aph@redhat.com
Thu Jul 10 14:39:00 GMT 2003
Jeff Sturm writes:
> On 2003年7月10日, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > > > Mohan> I don't have any ideas, but didn't you allude to this here?:
> > > > Mohan> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2002-04/msg00180.html
> > > >
> > > > I re-read this. I think it would make sense to add selected locale
> > > > classes to FirstThread.java, to make static linking work a little
> > > > better. We can just add the minimal set.
> >
> > I would have thought it would make more sense to put this stuff in a
> > special file that only gets lined when linking statically. In
> > addition, users could add classes to this file without recompiling
> > libgcj.
>
> However we do it, we have a request to link Output_ASCII in 3.3, which
> closes tomorrow...
Right, but there's no reason not to kludge 3.3 while doing something
better on the trunk.
Andrew.
More information about the Java
mailing list