>It's harder with gcj, since the distributions lag gcc by quite a bit, >and libgcj changes frequently. Usually you end up wanting the next >gcj release, or sometimes the cvs version. Huh? Were you allowed to say that out loud? I'd want the CVS version even more if someone reviewed and/or checked this in: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q2/msg00564.html ( :) ) -- Mohan http://www.thisiscool.com/ http://www.animalsong.org/