Mauve harness failure on s390

Fri Jan 31 16:46:00 GMT 2003

Hi,
On Fri, 2003年01月31日 at 17:06, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Yeah, it is hard to do the pruning correctly. I still wish we'd put
> in a new gcj flag instead.
>> This is on my list of things to fix in the near future. But if
> someone else wants to fix it, feel free.

How does this look.
2003年01月31日 Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>

 * lib/libjava.exp (libjava_prune_warnings): Remove all unreachable
 bytecode warnings.
OK for branch and mainline?
Cheers,
Mark
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: exp.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 959 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/java/attachments/20030131/b54306ac/attachment.bin>