gcj darwin test results for 3.3

Fri Jan 10 18:34:00 GMT 2003

Andrew Haley wrote:
> =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andreas=5FTobler?= writes:
> > Hi,
> > > and here the results for 3.3.
> > > Looks promising :)
> > > Andreas
> > > === libjava Summary ===
> > > # of expected passes 2769
> > # of unexpected failures 71
>> Getting better.

Would it make send to post the sum and /the log file to find out on what 
I should concentrate first? If so, to whom should I send?
Now I think it makes sense to start investigating what's going wrong on 
certain TC's. Before I wasn't sure if it was expect/kerenl or the TC itself.
Thanks,
Andreas