Status page

Wed Feb 19 08:51:00 GMT 2003

>-- Original Message --
>Is this result with pending patches to (at least) boehm-gc/configure.in?

These are (hopefully) pending patches. Not only configure.in. See the gc-mailing
list for further details. (http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/gc/2003-February/date.html)
>If so, then excellent, you are ahead of where I thought you were based
>on Hans' statement of undiagnosed mismatch in configurations. I'd
>say/agree that you have the threaded-GC configuration working well
>enough to support libjava.

This statement was about a week or so ago ;)
>If not (i.e. you are using boehm-gc exactly as in CVS), then I am
>confused. I don't see how Darwin gets GC_PTHREADS defined within
>boehm-gc. Thus, I don't see how it could ever attempt 3 concurrent
>tests and report the above.
>>> With the hopefully coming soon thread support in [libjava?].
>>Assuming the above report is indeed to threaded-GC on Darwin, take a
>close look at this configuration nugget buried in libjava/posix-threads.cc:

Good spot, have to have a look at.
>It might be the root cause of test cases involving _Jv_ThreadInterrupt
>failing...

The test passes now, I'm now in the stage where I only have jni failures,
SynchTest and Throw_2. Plus some other minor? ones.
But I go over again.
Thanks,
Andreas
P.S see gcc-results from this morning.