Hi Ranjit, (cf. also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2003-02/msg00134.html) >See this message for the fix: >>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2002-12/msg00232.html Do you prefer this approach or patching atomicity.h as per http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2003-01/msg00278.html which would theoretically allow 386 builds? Does anyone know if and when the latter is going to get committed? >You must first build the cross-compiler (needed only once) before >you use it to build the crossed-native compiler. That's what I was doing, but as per Lars, there seems to be a hardcoded path problem. Thanks for the JNI patch list. -- Mohan http://www.thisiscool.com/ http://www.animalsong.org/