Serialisation bug with abstract classes

Mon Dec 22 16:42:00 GMT 2003

 > It was broken before too, otherwise I would have never thought tp dp
 > some work on it.
OK, it's completely fine then.
 > The reason to this not at once is to understand the
 > code more that gets changed and why. Well its CVS HEAD. ITs known to
 > cause problems. Nobody really expects it to work 100% always. Its for
 > development.
Agreed. It's still better to avoid *knowingly* breaking it when you can, 
isn't it?
Cheers,
Daniel
The Nice programming language: http://nice.sf.net