libgcc_s.so.1 and libgcj.so.4

Sat Apr 19 15:53:00 GMT 2003

Hi Erik,
I seem to have statically linked libgcc_s.a and libgcj.a by configuring 
the gcc suite with the option "--disable-shared". When I run ldd on my 
gcj/swt-motif app, I get the following results:
 libswt-motif-2133.so => motif/libswt-motif-2133.so (0x40017000)
 libXm.so.2 => motif/libXm.so.2 (0x4005c000)
 libm.so.6 => /lib/i686/libm.so.6 (0x40206000)
 libpthread.so.0 => /lib/i686/libpthread.so.0 (0x40229000)
 libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40279000)
 libc.so.6 => /lib/i686/libc.so.6 (0x4027d000)
 libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x403b5000)
 libXt.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x40494000)
 libXp.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXp.so.6 (0x404e6000)
 /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
 libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x404ef000)
 libSM.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x404fd000)
 libICE.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x40506000)
which do not include libgcc_s.so.1 or libgcj.so.4, as opposed to my app 
binary from my "--enable-shared" gcc configurations. Does disabling 
sharing, however, create other complications for the application?
-David