RawData ?

Sun Apr 6 19:14:00 GMT 2003

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am Sonntag, 6. April 2003 20:08 schrieb Tom Tromey:
> >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de> writes:
>> Michael> Now that classpath HEAD has gnu.classpath.RawData and GCJ
> has Michael> gnu.gcj.RawData what is the preferred name this class
> should have ?
>> Michael> Should we remove gnu.gcj.RawData in gcj and merge
> Michael> gnu.classpath.RawData ?
>> Right now I don't see a reason to. I think the Classpath RawData
> is only used in one place. That is Class, which we will only be
> able to partially merge anyway (and our implementation can't have
> any fields visible to Java anyway, since that makes the compiler
> crash).
>> If we need to merge a class that uses this, we can just tweak the
> import. If that gets too burdensome, we can consider a change.
>> What do you think of that?

Eeek, I already merged gnu.java.nio stuff a little bit which uses 
gnu.gcj.RawData. Thats why I wrote the mail. Currently the libgcj 
version uses gnu.gcj.RawData and the classpath version uses 
gnu.classpath.RawData. Execept the copyright statement and package 
name both java files are identical. Thats why I thought they could be 
merged.
Michael
- -- 
Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+kK//WSOgCCdjSDsRApRKAJ4hh/1G85Td1v0yrMOqud+I93W28QCgi4B5
RPMBfgqRkSS33+aL1Nx2w+4=
=DH0b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----