Is this a bug?

Wed Sep 4 13:17:00 GMT 2002

The attached patch appears to fix the problem. However, I don't
know if it breaks anything else, partly because I don't quite
understand to comment in java_complete_tree, and I haven't tried
whatever testcase it is supposed to fix. However, it looks like
there's a good chance this patch will fix it.
The patch isn't quite right, because it doesn't complain about
the following:
 public final static long a = 1000000000;
 public final static long b = 1000.0 * a;
I'll figure out a more correct patch, one that also does the
necesary type-checking.
-- 
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com http://www.bothner.com/per/
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: parse.patch
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/java/attachments/20020904/6985ba67/attachment.ksh>