gcc-3.2 build problem in the java area

Fri Oct 11 10:07:00 GMT 2002

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:

Andrew> I'm sure I could do something evil like `#define
Andrew> __EXTENSIONS__' but I hope that there is a more civilized way
Andrew> to solve this problem.
We already have a couple hacks like this. One is in include/posix.h.
Is __EXTENSIONS__ really the thing to define?
Or does this get defined as the result of defining some macro we're
supposed to define?
Tom