printing exceptions?

Sat Mar 30 01:18:00 GMT 2002

On Mar 15, 2002, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mar 15, 2002, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 07:43:43PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>> Another possibility that occurred to me, that would further alleviate
>>> the problem of duplicate shared libraries, would be to get GCC to no
>>> longer issue the `-lgcc_s -lc -lgcc_s' sequence, but instead, to use
>>> just `-lgcc_s -lc'.

>> Seems ok.

> Yay! I'll try to implement this in the next few days.

Err... For large values of `few' :-(
Here's the patch I came up with, that I've already done some testing
with, and that's undergoing bootstrapping now. Ok to install?
Perhaps even in 3.1? Can anybody think of further libraries that
could be removed from the former second expansion of %G?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: libgcc-libc-spec.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3787 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/java/attachments/20020330/b9994798/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
-- 
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer