xscale-elf-gcj status: looking good

Mon Mar 18 12:34:00 GMT 2002

Anthony Green <green@redhat.com> writes:
> On Sun, 2002年03月17日 at 09:53, Anthony Green wrote:
> > xscale-elf-gcj 3.1 is looking pretty good right now. It all builds and the
> > testsuite runs with reasonable looking results (so far).

> Whoops. I spoke too soon. I had forgotten that my tree included
> Adam's patch to solve an EH problem he discovered on mingw32. His
> patch simply backs out a change made by Jason in December, and
> appears to be necessary for sjlj-enabled targets. It looks like
> some C++ code is being miscompiled (natClass probably).

Do you mean that without my unpatch, you get bad code, or with my
unpatch you get bad code?
If the former, do you think you could lend me some clout in getting
the patch approved? It's becoming stale...
 - a
-- 
"If I put copyrighted material into the 'chewy nougat center', I can
 claim the crunchy chocolate coating is an 'Access Control
 Mechanism'." --lynx_user_abroad