On 15 Mar 2002, Tom Tromey wrote: > Second, if so, then doesn't that imply that the 2.8 problem is fixed? > (If you've got some time, would you mind testing this? If you can't, > tell me, and I'll see if I can do it.) I tried bootstrapping mainline with --enable-libgcj and an already existing installed tree at --prefix, but failed due to an unrelated failure: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-03/msg00925.html> I'll try the 3.1-branch ASAP, but to make sure, is this the test you had in mind? Gerald -- Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/